Register For NLP Content!

Learn NLP Today
  • 819 subscribers

Categories

NOTE To New Visitors: Welcome! Our content posts are cut-off at first 250 words. To read the full post, please click on the TITLE of the post. :)

NLP Meta Programs: What Are They?

The theory behind NLP is that our communication is affected by our mental “filters”. These filters are the reason why we delete, distort and generalize things.

NLP Meta Programs are one example of mental filters. We tend to have certain personality preferences. NLP Meta Programs are closely associated with several personality traits like the introvert and extrovert dimension in the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.

However, from the NLP perspective, meta programs go beyond personality. Thought it is the fabric of our behavior, it is likely that meta program preferences can change, unlike regular “personality” traits. In other words, if we want to be a leader, we can model after the leadership meta programs — the traits that make a person a leader.

Here are some of the Meta Programs that are commonly known

  1. Toward — Away From
  2. Introvert — Extrovert
  3. Low Chunk — High Chunk
  4. Logic — Feeling
  5. Visual — Auditory — Kinesthetic — Digital
  6. Internal — External
  7. Convincer Filter: Once, Three Times, All the Time
  8. Match — Mismatch
  9. Optimist — Pessimist
  10. Foreground — Background

So, while these meta programs are not exhaustive (yet), they also contain a high level of structure that can be used for a variety of things such as changing preferred actions. For instance, someone who always gets into trouble because he is a “mismatcher” can be shifted into a “matcher” mode to appear to be less of a trouble maker. Each of these outlines a process. If I have a strategy to “match” I can learn the strategy to “mismatch”.

We can discuss the idea of meta programs and their implications in relation to strategies and submodalities.

Any questions? Just drop them in the comments box below!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • BarraPunto
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • BlogMemes Cn
  • Blogsvine
  • blogtercimlap
  • Blue Dot
  • Book.mark.hu
  • Bumpzee
  • co.mments
  • connotea
  • De.lirio.us
  • DZone
  • email
  • Fark
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • Gwar
  • HealthRanker
  • Internetmedia
  • Kirtsy
  • LinkaGoGo
  • LinkedIn
  • Linkter
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MisterWong
  • MisterWong.DE
  • MyShare
  • Netvouz
  • NewsVine
  • PlugIM
  • PopCurrent
  • Pownce
  • Print
  • Propeller
  • RawSugar
  • Reddit
  • SalesMarks
  • scuttle
  • Simpy
  • Slashdot
  • Smarking
  • Socialogs
  • SphereIt
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Taggly
  • TailRank
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis
  • Wikio
  • Wists
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Yigg
  • Erik Frandsen
    Dear Stuart

    You are right. In many cases the two-dimentional preference model makes sens. And it is practical when you want to know about a persons probability for a certin behaviour in a given situation.

    I am however trying to look into other possible models
    to get a better understanding of how metaprograms work.
  • stuart
    Hey Erik,

    Yes, the concepts behind the Psychological Types are not exactly the same, but Meta Programs do have a similar basis in the idea of preference. In other words, that's how one might actually come up with a dichotomy to check a preference - that a person might prefer one thing or another.

    If you have a way to assess a person's preferences across more than 2 dimensions, I'm sure that will be helpful, though I fear it may not be as easy to understand.
  • Erik Frandsen
    Hi Stuart
    I wish it was so simple.
    If you trace back MBTI to Jung and even further back to Freud you will see that the conceptual world behind MBTI is substantially different from the concept of Meta Programs.
    Anyway my question is not concerning the historic background on which Meta Programs developed, rather it concerns if it make sense to work with a bipolar model for a phenomenon that is clearly not of a bipolar nature?
  • Erik Frandsen
    The model for Metaprograms in NLP is bipolar:
    eg. Towards - Away from
    It seems logical and resonable.
    But people are not logical and resonable.

    I think that people can at the same time be attracted to something and try to avoid it?

    I think another model for the metaprograms could help to beter understand metaprograms, and thereby also increase the possibility for working with them and change them if that is what we want.
    I am working on an other model and would like to hear comments on the subject.

    STUART says:
    Hi Erik,
    Meta Programs are on seperate dichotomies, and a based on the concepts within the MBTI. They are both preference tools. Depending on the state within the environment in which people are in, people prefer something by default.
blog comments powered by Disqus